Where the Claim Began
The modern golden ratio craze traces largely to a single 1919 book, Frederik Macody Lund's Ad Quadratum, which superimposed golden rectangles onto plans of Chartres, Laon and Notre Dame with little regard for measurement error [1]. Lund had already applied the same theory to Nidaros Cathedral in Norway, a claim an international panel of experts formally rejected in 1922 [2]. Historians now treat the book as historiographically important but geometrically unreliable.
The Case Against: Data Dredging, Not Mysticism
The sharpest skeptic is a mathematician, not an art historian. His central charge is not simple measurement error but what would now be called confirmation bias, dimensions chosen after seeing the building, alternative ratios ignored, and only successful matches reported [3, pp. 2.19]. No surviving medieval treatise, contract or building account specifies a numerical ratio at all, only ropes, compasses, squares and triangles are mentioned. So any claim of intentional phi must be inferred from geometry, never read from a document.
Deliberate Geometry, Broader Than One Building
Here the picture has shifted. Villard de Honnecourt's own drawings show ad quadratum and ad triangulum construction, yielding root two and root three, not phi [4, pp. 65.78]. A recent CAD based analysis of laser scanned data from Saint Denis, Sens, Bourges, Chartres and Reims found consistent use of squares, triangles and pentagons to set proportions, concluding that Otto von Simson's older thesis of deliberate geometric planning was essentially correct, while noting that actual construction drifted from the ideal as building proceeded [5]. Pentagon schemes mathematically generate the golden ratio automatically, so where they were chosen, phi followed without necessarily being the named target.
A Workshop by Workshop Difference
Decades spent reading mason marks at Chartres led one researcher to identify nine separate master masons working in sequence, and to argue that only one, nicknamed Bronze, deliberately used the golden mean, while colleagues on the same building worked from different rules entirely [6]. The claim remains controversial and is not widely accepted, but it suggests a plausible middle position, not a universal doctrine, not an accident, a choice made by some individual workshops and not others.
Reading Symbolism Into Stone
A third strand, running back through Von Simson himself to later writers, reads such geometry as deliberate theology, squaring the circle to unite earth and heaven [7]. This is harder to verify than a laser scan and rests on interpretation, but it continues an established scholarly line, not a new one.
No consensus exists on a cathedral wide golden mean. The strongest evidence points to deliberate use of sophisticated geometric construction systems, squares and triangles predominating, with pentagon schemes, and occasionally the golden mean itself, chosen by specific workshops in specific buildings. This supports neither the popular claim that Gothic architecture was universally designed around phi, nor the opposite claim that every occurrence is accidental. It supports a picture of varied practice, workshop by workshop.
This blog is original work by TemplarsNowTM based on an AI-assisted quick scan on the topic. References and further reading, all links verified September 1, 2026, not all sources studied in detail: [1] Lund, F.M. 1919, Ad Quadratum: A Study of the Geometrical Bases of Classic and Medieval Religious Architecture, Kristiania, Helge Erichsen & Co; [2] Wikipedia, Frederik Macody Lund; [3] Markowsky, G., 1992, Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio", The College Mathematics Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, 1992, pp. 2.19; [4] Zenner, M-T., 2002, Villard de Honnecourt and Euclidean Geometry", *Nexus Network Journal*, vol. 4, 2002, pp. 65.78; [5] Bork, R., 2022, A Geometrical Perspective on Otto von Simson's Gothic Cathedral", Nexus Network Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, 2022, pp. 397-421; [6] Wikipedia, John James (Australian architect), summarising his Master Masons of Chartres research; [7] Ramzy, N.S., 2021, Concept cathedral and squaring the circle: Interpreting the Gothic cathedral of Notre Dame de Paris as a standing hymn, Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 10, no. 2, 2021, pp. 369.393. The illustration shows two chevet plans from Villard de Honnecourt's sketchbook, folio 15r, circa 1225 to 1235. The upper plan, credited to Villard and Pierre de Corbie jointly, shows exactly the kind of compass drawn, radiating chapel geometry later laser scanned at Bourges, chosen deliberately, not left to chance. Source, Wikimedia, Public Domain.
Support TemplarsNow™ by becoming a Patron, tipping us or buying one of our Reliable Books
or other products at Amazon or Bol via our affiliate links amazon.com and
bol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment